Benchmark
Simple (and quite complex) operations are currently ~2x faster in jstr than in similar tools such as jq.node:
hyperfine --warmup 3 \
"cat tmp/users.json | jqn 'filter(has(\"email\")) | groupBy(flow(get(\"email\"), split(\"@\"), get(1)))'" \
"cat tmp/users.json | jstr -i \"flow(A.filter(D.get('email')), A.groupBy(flow(D.get('email'), S.split('@'), A.get(1))))\""Package
Version
Time (mean ± σ)
Range (min … max)
Runs
@jliocsar/jstr
0.3.6
110.8 ms ± 4.5 ms
104.7 ms … 124.8 ms
26
jq.node
3.0.0
217.7 ms ± 9.2 ms
204.3 ms … 237.2 ms
13
Tested on:
Node v20.7.0
Linux 6.2.0-32-generic x86_64 x86_64
11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1165G7 @ 2.80GHz
Last updated